Skip to content

Governance: Accessibility coverage & data

The following indicator is under consideration for this pilot edition of the Barometer: To what extent do relevant laws, regulations, policies, and guidance require that data collection and publication be accessible through screen readers, call relays, and similar accessibility tools?

Feedback on draft Global Data Barometer Indicators

You are looking at a draft indicator to be included in the expert survey of the Global Data Barometer. Between now and May 10th we are inviting your feedback on this indicator and the elements it contains. You can provide your feedback by (a) completing the feedback form below; or (b) adding in-line annotations.

Feedback form

You can share your feedback on the Governance: Accessibility coverage & data indicator here, or make use of Hypothes.is annotations

Show/hide supporting questions

Existence

  • What is the nature of the framework?

    • No framework exists
      Supporting questions: In the absence of a strong legal framework, are there alternative norms or customs that play this role in the country? If so, please explain how. If there are draft laws or regulations not yet in force, but that would provide a more robust framework in future, please provide brief details here.
    • A framework exists but lacks full force of law
      Supporting questions: In the absence of a strong legal framework, are there alternative norms or customs that play this role in the country? If so, please explain how. If there are draft laws or regulations not yet in force, but that would provide a more robust framework in future, please provide brief details here.
    • A framework exists and has the force of law
      Supporting questions: Please identify the framework(s) you have assessed (e.g. name of law(s) or regulations)

  • Where does this requirement exist?

    • It does not exist.
    • There is a broader framework which can be presumed to apply to data.
    • There is either a dedicated framework for accessibility coverage related to data or a framework that includes specific provisions related to accessibility coverage and data.

Extent

  • How comprehensive, in terms of jurisdiction, is the coverage of the laws, regulations, policies, or guidance assessed for this question?
    • They cover one or more localities, but there are many other localities without such rules/guidance, or with rules or guidance of a lesser quality.
      Supporting questions: Which locality does this framework cover?
    • They cover one or more localities and are a representative example of the kind of rules/guidance that can be found for all, or most, localities.
    • They provide national coverage.

Definitions and Identification

First identify whether your country has a framework that specifies the accessibility coverage that the government must make its communications available in. Then examine the framework to determine how it applies to the government's datasets, data tools, and other data communications.

Alternatively, you can look first for a dedicated framework that addresses accessibility matters with regard to government data collection and publication (these are not currently common) and then apply the steps outlined above to that framework.

Starting points

  • Search:

    • Government websites for "accessibility requirements" and similar terms

  • Consult:

    • Government officials who serve in communications roles

What to look for?

Look for evidence that can answer the following question:

  • Is there a framework that addresses how government datasets and data tools must be made available with regard to call relays, screen readers, and other accessibility tools?

National and sub-national considerations

In some countries, frameworks that govern accessibility coverage may be established primarily by individual states, regions, or cities. To assess such countries, researchers should select the strongest examples of sub-national practice, and then indicate whether this is an outlier or an example of widespread practice.

Accessibility coverage is a key component of making data both accurate and open. The accessibility coverage of the data collection will affect how well the person providing the data understands the interaction—with consequences for both meaningful consent and data quality. Similarly, the accessibility coverage of the formats in which data and its explanatory materials are published will affect who can use that data and how.